Breach of Contract: Are Attorney’s Fees Recoverable?

by Jennifer Tatum Lee on January 20, 2012

Clients who have been damaged by a breach of contract want to be made whole.  However, if a client has to pay a lawyer to recover contract amounts that should have been paid without legal action, then the cleint is left less than whole.  But, what if the party who breaches a contract has to pay not only the owed money on the contract, but attorney’s fees, as well?  Certain statutes provide for just such a result.

The general rule in Texas is that each party pays its own attorney’s fees.  Turner v. Turner, 385 S.W.2d 230, 233 (Tex. 1964).  However, attorney’s fees are recoverable under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 38.001 in lawsuits for (1) rendered services; performed labor; (3) furnished material; (4) freight or express overcharges; (5) lost or damaged freight or express; (6) killed or injured stock; (7) a sworn account; or (8) an oral or written contract.  The most common lawsuits where this section is invoked by litigators are suits on sworn accounts, oral or written contracts and lawsuits for rendered services or performed labor.

This statute can be a useful avenue to obtain attorney’s fees from your opponent because it is not a discretionary statute.  In other words, the judge (provided that proof and pleading and other requirements are met) does not have discretion in awarding fees to the prevailing party.  D. F. W. Christian Television, Inc. v. Thorton, 933 S.W.2d 488, 490 (Tex. 1996).  Attorney’s fees are recoverable for work before and during trial.  Further, the general rule is that a trial court’s award of attorney’s fees may include appellate attorney’s fees.  Neal v. SMC Corp., 99 S.W.3d 813, 818 (Tex. App. — Dallas, 2003, no pet).  Attorney’s fees can also be recovered in cases where the attorney is working on a contingent fee (e.g. 33% of the recovery).  As a litigator I often try to invoke § 38.001  in breach of contract lawsuits, where applicable, to create a path for the recovery of attorney’s fees and the opportunity to make my client whole.

 

{ 0 comments }

What a Breach of Contract Attorney Must Prove

by David Dunham on January 19, 2012

To prevail on a breach a contract claim, a plaintiff (the damaged party) must prove (1) a valid contract existed between the plaintiff and the defendant (the party who breaches the contract), (2) the plaintiff tendered performance or was excused from doing so, (3) the defendant breached the terms of the contract, and (4) the plaintiff sustained damages as a result of the defendant’s breach.  West v. Triple B Servs., LLP, 264 S.W.3d 440, 446 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.).  But, what if the breaching party claims they never actually read the contract and, therefore, cannot be held liable for breaching it?  Such an argument will provide no defense whatsoever to a breach of contract claim.  By signing a contract, a party is presumed to have read and understood its contents.  See In re Prudential Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 134 (Tex. 2004).  Cantella & Co., Inc. v. Goodwin, 924 S.W.2d 943, 944 (Tex. 1996) (Texas law presumes a party who signs a contract has read it and knows of its contents).

{ 0 comments }

Copyright Infringement: A Strict Liability Cause of Action

January 12, 2012

Copyright infringement is essentially a strict liability cause of action.  In other words, the mental state of the copier generally does not matter on the issue of whether an illegal infringement has occurred.  Under the Copyright Act, the threshold question is whether a copyright defendant has made copies, distributed copies, prepared derivative works, publicly performed, [...]

Read the full article →

Navigating the World of Professional Legal Negligence/Legal Malpractice and the Disciplinary Rules

January 11, 2012

In rendering their legal services to clients, lawyers must comply with professional standards and disciplinary rules. What happens when a lawyer fails to fulfill his responsibilities to a client with respect to documenting a deal, handling litigation, meeting deadlines, meeting the statute of limitations for a claim, disclosing confidential client information, failing to file paperwork [...]

Read the full article →

Patent Infringement Attorneys Proving Damages

January 5, 2012

In patent infringement litigation, the issue of product marking can be critical. Patent owners who do not mark their products are prevented by 35 U.S.C. § 287 from recovering any damages for any of the infringement occurring prior to serving an actual notice of infringement, or bringing suit. As an exception, products that only use [...]

Read the full article →

Trademark Infringement Remedies

January 3, 2012

Trademark infringement attorneys frequently must evaluate whether a client whose trademark has been infringed has a claim only for injunctive relief or also a worthwhile case for monetary damages. First, everyone has seen the typical trademark symbols of “TM, SM, and ®.” These symbols appear quite often in marketing and advertising documents for products and [...]

Read the full article →

Trade secret litigation: When does your proprietary information and technology qualify as a trade secret?

December 30, 2011

What trade secret is worth litigating over? The answer to that question will vary from business to business. As a trade secret litigator, I have seen litigation over software code, business methods, software/hardware requirements, SMS/cell phone technology, customer lists, medical devices and chemical formulas. That is a pretty broad list of technology and information, which [...]

Read the full article →

Understanding the Power and Gravity of the Fiduciary Duty

December 20, 2011

The highest duty under the law is the fiduciary duty.  Some people are surprised when they learn that they owe their partners fiduciary duties.  When fiduciary duties apply to a business or personal context, the fiduciary may not engage in self-dealing and must treat his or her partners or other beneficiaries with utmost good faith [...]

Read the full article →

The Collision of the Entrepreneural and Litigation World

December 15, 2011

Excited. Passionate. Devoted: the foregoing describe the relationship between the entrepreneurs I have had the pleasure of representing, and their ideas. I usually get to hear the longer version of their elevator pitch. I also get to hear about how excited they were to get the angel or venture capital funding and how their investors [...]

Read the full article →

Patent Infringement Injunctive Relief

December 13, 2011

Patent infringement attorneys know that the opportunity to obtain an injunction against the infringer in patent infringement litigation is a powerful weapon. The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. weakened this weapon somewhat through it’s ruling that there was no presumption of irreparable harm, which is a prerequisite for injunctive [...]

Read the full article →