
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taylor Dunham, LLP - Austin, Texas Trial Lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taylordunham.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taylordunham.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Construction Litigation:  You Are the Expert</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/construction-litigation-you-are-the-expert/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/construction-litigation-you-are-the-expert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I get to trade my high heels in for boots and a hard hat when visiting construction clients at the job site. Those are always fun days for me. When I was a &#8220;baby&#8221; lawyer, I got the privilege of visiting a construction client at a job site at the DFW airport. While the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/construction-litigation-you-are-the-expert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arbitration</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/arbitration/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/arbitration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract disputes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a trial lawyer, a civil litigator. Sometimes I get asked if that means that I handle arbitration disputes as well. It does. What is arbitration? How do you get there? How does it differ from a state or federal court litigation? Arbitration has been described as &#8220;[a] contractual proceeding by which the parties [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/arbitration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Malpractice:  The Formation of the Attorney-Client Relationship</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/legal-malpractice-the-formation-of-the-attorney-client-relationship/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/legal-malpractice-the-formation-of-the-attorney-client-relationship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney-client relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legal malpractice attorneys must sometimes litigate whether or not an attorney-client relationship was formed in a particular situation. I just finished a legal malpractice jury trial in the 345th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas against a large law firm. The jury returned a verdict in favor of our client. There were several issues [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/legal-malpractice-the-formation-of-the-attorney-client-relationship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breach of Contract:  Are Attorney&#8217;s Fees Recoverable?</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/breach-of-contract-are-attorneys-fees-recoverable/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/breach-of-contract-are-attorneys-fees-recoverable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney's fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Texas breach of contract attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery of attorney's fees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clients who have been damaged by a breach of contract want to be made whole.  However, if a client has to pay a lawyer to recover contract amounts that should have been paid without legal action, then the cleint is left less than whole.  But, what if the party who breaches a contract has to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/breach-of-contract-are-attorneys-fees-recoverable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What a Breach of Contract Attorney Must Prove</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/what-a-breach-of-contract-attorney-must-prove/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/what-a-breach-of-contract-attorney-must-prove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Dunham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Texas breach of contract attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract claim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To prevail on a breach a contract claim, a plaintiff (the damaged party) must prove (1) a valid contract existed between the plaintiff and the defendant (the party who breaches the contract), (2) the plaintiff tendered performance or was excused from doing so, (3) the defendant breached the terms of the contract, and (4) the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/what-a-breach-of-contract-attorney-must-prove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Infringement:  A Strict Liability Cause of Action</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/copyright-infringement-a-strict-liability-cause-of-action/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/copyright-infringement-a-strict-liability-cause-of-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Dunham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement strict liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright infringement is essentially a strict liability cause of action.  In other words, the mental state of the copier generally does not matter on the issue of whether an illegal infringement has occurred.  Under the Copyright Act, the threshold question is whether a copyright defendant has made copies, distributed copies, prepared derivative works, publicly performed, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/copyright-infringement-a-strict-liability-cause-of-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigating the World of Professional Legal Negligence/Legal Malpractice and the Disciplinary Rules</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/navigating-the-world-of-professional-legal-negligencelegal-malpractice-and-the-disciplinary-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/navigating-the-world-of-professional-legal-negligencelegal-malpractice-and-the-disciplinary-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In rendering their legal services to clients, lawyers must comply with professional standards and disciplinary rules. What happens when a lawyer fails to fulfill his responsibilities to a client with respect to documenting a deal, handling litigation, meeting deadlines, meeting the statute of limitations for a claim, disclosing confidential client information, failing to file paperwork [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/navigating-the-world-of-professional-legal-negligencelegal-malpractice-and-the-disciplinary-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Infringement Attorneys Proving Damages</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/patent-infringement-attorneys-proving-damages/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/patent-infringement-attorneys-proving-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Dunham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In patent infringement litigation, the issue of product marking can be critical. Patent owners who do not mark their products are prevented by 35 U.S.C. § 287 from recovering any damages for any of the infringement occurring prior to serving an actual notice of infringement, or bringing suit. As an exception, products that only use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/patent-infringement-attorneys-proving-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademark Infringement Remedies</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trademark-infringement-remedies/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trademark-infringement-remedies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trademark infringement attorneys frequently must evaluate whether a client whose trademark has been infringed has a claim only for injunctive relief or also a worthwhile case for monetary damages. First, everyone has seen the typical trademark symbols of &#8220;TM, SM, and ®.&#8221; These symbols appear quite often in marketing and advertising documents for products and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trademark-infringement-remedies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade secret litigation:  When does your proprietary information and technology qualify as a trade secret?</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trade-secret-litigation-when-does-your-proprietary-information-and-technology-qualify-as-a-trade-secret/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trade-secret-litigation-when-does-your-proprietary-information-and-technology-qualify-as-a-trade-secret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 21:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret misappropriation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What trade secret is worth litigating over? The answer to that question will vary from business to business. As a trade secret litigator, I have seen litigation over software code, business methods, software/hardware requirements, SMS/cell phone technology, customer lists, medical devices and chemical formulas. That is a pretty broad list of technology and information, which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trade-secret-litigation-when-does-your-proprietary-information-and-technology-qualify-as-a-trade-secret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

