
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taylor Dunham, LLP - Austin, Texas Trial Lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taylordunham.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taylordunham.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Breach of Contract:  Are Attorney&#8217;s Fees Recoverable?</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/breach-of-contract-are-attorneys-fees-recoverable/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/breach-of-contract-are-attorneys-fees-recoverable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney's fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Texas breach of contract attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery of attorney's fees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clients who have been damaged by a breach of contract want to be made whole.  However, if a client has to pay a lawyer to recover contract amounts that should have been paid without legal action, then the cleint is left less than whole.  But, what if the party who breaches a contract has to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/breach-of-contract-are-attorneys-fees-recoverable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What a Breach of Contract Attorney Must Prove</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/what-a-breach-of-contract-attorney-must-prove/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/what-a-breach-of-contract-attorney-must-prove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Dunham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Texas breach of contract attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract claim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To prevail on a breach a contract claim, a plaintiff (the damaged party) must prove (1) a valid contract existed between the plaintiff and the defendant (the party who breaches the contract), (2) the plaintiff tendered performance or was excused from doing so, (3) the defendant breached the terms of the contract, and (4) the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/what-a-breach-of-contract-attorney-must-prove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Infringement:  A Strict Liability Cause of Action</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/copyright-infringement-a-strict-liability-cause-of-action/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/copyright-infringement-a-strict-liability-cause-of-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Dunham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement strict liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Copyright infringement is essentially a strict liability cause of action.  In other words, the mental state of the copier generally does not matter on the issue of whether an illegal infringement has occurred.  Under the Copyright Act, the threshold question is whether a copyright defendant has made copies, distributed copies, prepared derivative works, publicly performed, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/copyright-infringement-a-strict-liability-cause-of-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigating the World of Professional Legal Negligence/Legal Malpractice and the Disciplinary Rules</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/navigating-the-world-of-professional-legal-negligencelegal-malpractice-and-the-disciplinary-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/navigating-the-world-of-professional-legal-negligencelegal-malpractice-and-the-disciplinary-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In rendering their legal services to clients, lawyers must comply with professional standards and disciplinary rules. What happens when a lawyer fails to fulfill his responsibilities to a client with respect to documenting a deal, handling litigation, meeting deadlines, meeting the statute of limitations for a claim, disclosing confidential client information, failing to file paperwork [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/navigating-the-world-of-professional-legal-negligencelegal-malpractice-and-the-disciplinary-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Infringement Attorneys Proving Damages</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/patent-infringement-attorneys-proving-damages/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/patent-infringement-attorneys-proving-damages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Dunham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In patent infringement litigation, the issue of product marking can be critical. Patent owners who do not mark their products are prevented by 35 U.S.C. § 287 from recovering any damages for any of the infringement occurring prior to serving an actual notice of infringement, or bringing suit. As an exception, products that only use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/patent-infringement-attorneys-proving-damages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademark Infringement Remedies</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trademark-infringement-remedies/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trademark-infringement-remedies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trademark infringement attorneys frequently must evaluate whether a client whose trademark has been infringed has a claim only for injunctive relief or also a worthwhile case for monetary damages. First, everyone has seen the typical trademark symbols of &#8220;TM, SM, and ®.&#8221; These symbols appear quite often in marketing and advertising documents for products and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trademark-infringement-remedies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade secret litigation:  When does your proprietary information and technology qualify as a trade secret?</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trade-secret-litigation-when-does-your-proprietary-information-and-technology-qualify-as-a-trade-secret/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trade-secret-litigation-when-does-your-proprietary-information-and-technology-qualify-as-a-trade-secret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 21:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret misappropriation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What trade secret is worth litigating over? The answer to that question will vary from business to business. As a trade secret litigator, I have seen litigation over software code, business methods, software/hardware requirements, SMS/cell phone technology, customer lists, medical devices and chemical formulas. That is a pretty broad list of technology and information, which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/trade-secret-litigation-when-does-your-proprietary-information-and-technology-qualify-as-a-trade-secret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the Power and Gravity of the Fiduciary Duty</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/understanding-the-power-and-gravity-of-the-fiduciary-duty/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/understanding-the-power-and-gravity-of-the-fiduciary-duty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malpratice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership disputes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=1029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The highest duty under the law is the fiduciary duty.  Some people are surprised when they learn that they owe their partners fiduciary duties.  When fiduciary duties apply to a business or personal context, the fiduciary may not engage in self-dealing and must treat his or her partners or other beneficiaries with utmost good faith [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/understanding-the-power-and-gravity-of-the-fiduciary-duty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Collision of the Entrepreneural and Litigation World</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/the-collision-of-the-entrepreneural-and-litigation-world/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/the-collision-of-the-entrepreneural-and-litigation-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Tatum Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capitalist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excited. Passionate. Devoted: the foregoing describe the relationship between the entrepreneurs I have had the pleasure of representing, and their ideas. I usually get to hear the longer version of their elevator pitch. I also get to hear about how excited they were to get the angel or venture capital funding and how their investors [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/the-collision-of-the-entrepreneural-and-litigation-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Infringement Injunctive Relief</title>
		<link>http://taylordunham.com/articles/patent-infringement-injunctive-relief/</link>
		<comments>http://taylordunham.com/articles/patent-infringement-injunctive-relief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Dunham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunctive Relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylordunham.com/?p=958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patent infringement attorneys know that the opportunity to obtain an injunction against the infringer in patent infringement litigation is a powerful weapon. The U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s 2006 decision in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. weakened this weapon somewhat through it&#8217;s ruling that there was no presumption of irreparable harm, which is a prerequisite for injunctive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://taylordunham.com/articles/patent-infringement-injunctive-relief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

