Taylor Dunham in the Press

Austin Gutter King Corp., Inc. v. Google, Inc.:Taylor Dunham represents Austin company in internet defamation case Download article

Linegar v. DLA Piper US, LLP.: Obtained a favorable verdict for client in legal malpractice lawsuit after a nearly three week jury trial. Download article

Ingalls v. SMTC Corp, et al.:  Defense of publicly-traded Canadian-based company and its international subsidiaries in the defense of an $80 million fraudulent transfer suit by a Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee. Obtained a final judgment of no liability for our clients after a two week trial. Download article

Eberhard v. Ballard:  Obtained a large jury verdict for clients in lawsuit against stock brokers.  Download article

Forgent Networks v. Matthews:  Obtained a jury verdict of no liability for our client, Forgent Networks, in suit by the widow of Forgent’s former director. The widow had been making a claim for up to $25 million seeking a percentage of Forgent’s patent licensing revenues. Download article

Milligan v. Papermaster et al.: Represented bankruptcy trustee of dot-com company against its former officers and directors alleging claims of breach of fiduciary duty leading to the collapse of the company. Download article

Teleplus v. Avantel:  Obtained a large jury verdict in favor of our client, a Texas telecommunication services company in suit against the second-largest telephone company in Mexico. Download article

Crystal Semiconductor v. Sigmatel: Successfully defeated a patent holder’s attempt to obtain a temporary injunction against our client in a patent infringement lawsuit and ultimately favorably settled the claim. Download article

Agrawal v. Drkoop.com: Obtained favorable settlement for a client who accused the dot-com of failing to account for all promised stock options. Download article

Kropka v. KML, Inc.: Obtained a large jury verdict for a client who was burned over half of his body due to the negligence of a local apartment complex. Download article

Wilie v. KJFK:  Obtained a large jury verdict  in a controversial case in which his client was defamed by a former local radio personality. Download article

Material included here is for informational purposes only and is not necessarily an indication of future results.